Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods detained under section 14-B(6)(i) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 had to be released on the registered dealer furnishing a surety bond, or whether the detaining officer could insist on bank guarantee or cash security.
Analysis: The provision governing detention and release of goods expressly distinguishes between registered and unregistered persons. For a registered consignor or consignee, release is to follow on furnishing security or executing a bond with sureties in the prescribed form and manner to the satisfaction of the detaining officer. The requirement of cash security, bank guarantee, or crossed bank draft is confined to cases where the consignor or consignee is not registered under the Act. The officer, therefore, has no authority to reject a surety bond furnished by a registered dealer and insist instead on bank guarantee.
Conclusion: The detaining officer was bound to release the goods on the petitioner, being a registered dealer, furnishing a surety bond; insistence on bank guarantee was unlawful and the impugned detention orders were unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a taxing statute specifically provides release of detained goods on a registered dealer furnishing a surety bond, the detaining authority cannot impose a more onerous security condition reserved for unregistered persons.