<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 813 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161455</link>
    <description>Where a taxing statute permits release of detained goods from a registered dealer on furnishing a surety bond, the detaining authority cannot insist on bank guarantee or cash security. The provision distinguishes registered from unregistered consignors or consignees: registered persons may secure release by executing a bond with sureties in the prescribed form, while bank guarantee, cash security or crossed bank draft is confined to unregistered persons. The officer therefore had no authority to reject the surety bond tendered by the registered dealer, and detention continued on an unlawful security condition was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:11:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 813 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161455</link>
      <description>Where a taxing statute permits release of detained goods from a registered dealer on furnishing a surety bond, the detaining authority cannot insist on bank guarantee or cash security. The provision distinguishes registered from unregistered consignors or consignees: registered persons may secure release by executing a bond with sureties in the prescribed form, while bank guarantee, cash security or crossed bank draft is confined to unregistered persons. The officer therefore had no authority to reject the surety bond tendered by the registered dealer, and detention continued on an unlawful security condition was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>