Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether sales tax liability adjusted or set off under the Bombay Sales Tax Rules could be treated as payment for deduction under section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: Section 43B allows deduction of tax, duty, cess or fee only on actual payment, but the statutory scheme in rule 41D and rule 45(3) of the Bombay Sales Tax Rules, 1959 creates an entitlement to adjust the sales tax payable against the corresponding amount by way of set-off in the return itself. The adjustment operates as a legal fiction of payment and functions like a deemed discharge of the liability. As the amount was an admitted tax liability and was validly adjusted under the sales tax scheme, the benefit could not be denied merely because no cash outflow occurred. The contention of double deduction was rejected because the adjustment itself represented the statutory incentive mechanism and not a second deduction.
Conclusion: The amount adjusted under the Bombay Sales Tax Rules constituted deemed payment and was deductible under section 43B. The question was answered in the affirmative and in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A statutory set-off or adjustment that legally operates as deemed payment of a tax liability satisfies the requirement of actual payment under section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.