Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 45A(1)(d) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 was sustainable when the assessee had disclosed the entire turnover in the returns and claimed exemption on a bona fide basis.
Analysis: Penalty under section 45A is attracted only when the assessee submits an incorrect or untrue return. The returns in question disclosed the full turnover, and the claim for exemption was made on the basis of then prevailing legal support. The subsequent change in legal position and the later payment of tax before assessment did not convert the original returns into false or incorrect returns. A penal provision of this nature is to be strictly construed, and the essential element required to invoke penalty was absent. The conduct disclosed no suppression of turnover and no basis for treating the claim as a deliberate attempt to evade tax.
Conclusion: The penalty was not exigible, and the order restoring the penalty was unsustainable. The assessee succeeded.