Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revisional authority was barred under section 20(2-A) from revising the assessment when the earlier appeal before the Tribunal had decided only one part of the turnover dispute, and whether the Tribunal's powers under section 21(4) made the whole assessment final so as to oust revision.
Analysis: Section 20(2-A) bars revision only in respect of an issue or question that was the subject-matter of an appeal before the Tribunal or was decided by it. The earlier appeal before the Tribunal concerned only the one-time addition sustained by the Appellate Deputy Commissioner; the correctness of the ten-times estimated addition was neither raised nor decided there. The Tribunal's power under section 21(4) to confirm, reduce, enhance or annul the assessment is only enabling and does not mean that, merely because no enhancement was made, every part of the assessment merged in the Tribunal's order or became immune from revision. The statutory bar operates issue-wise and not on the assessment year as a whole.
Conclusion: The revisional order was not barred by section 20(2-A), and the Tribunal was right in dismissing the challenge to it.
Ratio Decidendi: The bar against revision under section 20(2-A) applies only to the specific issue decided by the Tribunal, and not to other issues in the same assessment that were neither raised nor adjudicated in the prior appeal.