Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount already paid under section 140A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was liable to be treated as payment towards tax under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998, instead of being adjusted first towards interest.
Analysis: The Explanation to section 140A(1) provides that where the amount paid falls short of the aggregate tax and interest, the payment is to be adjusted first towards interest and only thereafter towards tax. The Scheme of 1998 contains a non obstante clause and prescribes its own method of determining the amount payable, but it does not contain any provision requiring re-adjustment of payments already made under section 140A. The clarifications relied upon by the assessee dealt with part payments made after tax arrears were computed and did not direct that a payment made under section 140A should be shifted to tax liability. The Scheme had therefore to be applied as framed, without importing a contrary adjustment mechanism from section 140A.
Conclusion: The payment made under section 140A could not be treated as payment towards tax liability under the Scheme. The issue was decided against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a special settlement scheme prescribes its own computation of tax arrears and is silent on re-adjustment of prior payments, the adjustment rule in section 140A continues to apply and such prior payment is first appropriated towards interest, not tax.