Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for claiming set-off on tax-paid raw material and incidental goods purchased from registered dealers, the assessee was required to prove that the selling dealers had actually paid tax.
Analysis: Section 8(1)(a) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958 grants set-off where a registered dealer purchases tax-paid raw material or incidental goods for manufacture. The definition of tax-paid goods in section 2(rr) and the scheme of the Act show that once the purchase is made from a registered dealer and supporting bills are produced, the purchasing dealer discharges his burden. If any doubt remains about whether tax was in fact suffered, the assessing authority must make the necessary enquiry. The purchasing dealer cannot be compelled to prove, as a condition precedent to set-off, that the selling registered dealer has actually remitted the tax. The principle of single-point taxation also supports this approach.
Conclusion: The assessee was not required to prove actual payment of tax by the selling registered dealers and was entitled to the set-off.
Ratio Decidendi: For claiming statutory set-off on tax-paid goods purchased from a registered dealer, production of the relevant bills by the purchasing dealer is sufficient to discharge the initial burden, and the onus shifts to the revenue to verify any doubt about tax payment by the seller.