Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether construction of a washable apron for railway platforms was a civil work covered by the composition scheme under section 7-D of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948.
Analysis: The composition scheme and the connected notification used the expression "civil works like" and not an exhaustive list. The wording indicated that the listed items were illustrative, and the authority had to examine the actual nature of the work in each case. On the facts, the work consisted of laying a cement concrete floor between railway lines at platforms, supported by the work details and plan filed by the petitioner. A narrow meaning excluding such work from the expression "civil work" was therefore unjustified.
Conclusion: The work of constructing a washable apron was held to be a civil contract covered by the composition scheme, and the rejection of the petitioner's claim on that score was set aside in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a tax exemption or composition scheme describes civil works by using the word "like", the enumeration is illustrative and the actual nature of the work must be examined to decide whether it is a civil work covered by the scheme.