Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods brought for construction of a factory before commencement of production could be subjected to entry tax under the notice issued under clause (3) of section 22-A of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958.
Analysis: The goods in question were purchased and brought into the State for construction and setting up of the factory, and not for carrying on business as such. The factory commenced production only later, after the relevant period for which entry tax was demanded. On the same reasoning as in the earlier decision relied upon, goods brought before commencement of business for construction of the factory do not attract entry tax as business purchases.
Conclusion: The demand of entry tax was not sustainable and the notice was quashed in favour of the petitioners.
Final Conclusion: Entry tax could not be levied on goods acquired solely for construction of the factory prior to commencement of business, and the impugned demand was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods brought before commencement of business for construction of a factory are not exigible to entry tax as purchases made in the course of business.