Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether question No. 1 arising from the Tribunal's order was a referable question of law requiring a reference under section 44(1) of the M. P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958.
Analysis: The application under section 44(2) was examined to determine whether the proposed question concerning the effective date of the eligibility certificate raised a referable question of law arising from the Tribunal's order. The Court found that this question did arise for consideration and was fit to be referred. As regards the second proposed question, no separate adjudication was undertaken in the order because it was stated to have already been answered in earlier decisions, and therefore it was not required to be separately called for reference in this proceeding.
Conclusion: Question No. 1 was held to be a referable question of law, and the Tribunal was directed to send a reference on that question under section 44(1) of the M. P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958.
Final Conclusion: The reference application succeeded to the extent of Question No. 1, while the remaining proposed question was not separately referred.
Ratio Decidendi: A question arising from a Tribunal's order is referable where it is found to be a question of law fit for reference under the statutory reference provision.