Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revisional order enhancing the assessment could be sustained when the assessee, despite seeking a personal hearing and an opportunity to adduce further evidence, was not heard before the order was passed.
Analysis: The revisional power under section 21 of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 is quasi-judicial in nature. Where sub-section (4) requires an opportunity to show cause against the proposed enhancement, that opportunity must, in the facts of the case, include a meaningful personal hearing, and may also require an opportunity to lead additional evidence. Since the assessee had specifically sought such hearing and additional opportunity, and it was denied, the order was passed in breach of natural justice.
Conclusion: The impugned order could not be sustained and was quashed for violation of natural justice.
Ratio Decidendi: In a quasi-judicial revision for enhancement, the statutory opportunity to show cause must be effectuated by a fair hearing, and denial of a requested personal hearing and opportunity to adduce evidence vitiates the order.