<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 488 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158704</link>
    <description>In a quasi-judicial revision for enhancement under section 21 of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, the statutory opportunity to show cause had to be given effect through a meaningful personal hearing and, where sought, an opportunity to adduce further evidence. The assessee had specifically requested both, but was not heard before the revisional order was made. That denial breached natural justice and vitiated the enhanced assessment. The order was therefore quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 17:35:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 488 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158704</link>
      <description>In a quasi-judicial revision for enhancement under section 21 of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, the statutory opportunity to show cause had to be given effect through a meaningful personal hearing and, where sought, an opportunity to adduce further evidence. The assessee had specifically requested both, but was not heard before the revisional order was made. That denial breached natural justice and vitiated the enhanced assessment. The order was therefore quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>