TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether freight, loading and unloading charges incurred for bringing purchased goods to the dealer's premises formed part of the dealer's turnover and taxable turnover; (ii) Whether reassessment under section 19 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 was justified on the ground of escaped turnover.
Issue (i): Whether freight, loading and unloading charges incurred for bringing purchased goods to the dealer's premises formed part of the dealer's turnover and taxable turnover.
Analysis: The definition of turnover in the Act covers the aggregate amount for which goods are bought or sold, and taxable turnover is reached only after statutory deductions. Rule 9(f) permits deduction of freight and delivery charges only when they are separately specified and charged in the sale transaction. The amounts in question were not sale-side deductions but pre-sale expenses incurred by the dealer in purchasing and transporting cement from outside the State to his own premises. In the absence of proof of any arrangement making the purchasers liable for those charges, the amounts could not be excluded from the dealer's turnover.
Conclusion: The freight, loading and unloading charges formed part of the dealer's purchase turnover and were not deductible from taxable turnover; the finding is against the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether reassessment under section 19 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 was justified on the ground of escaped turnover.
Analysis: Section 19 authorises reopening where turnover has escaped assessment, been under-assessed, or a deduction has been wrongly made. The original assessment had proceeded without including the freight-related expenditure connected with the purchases, so the escaped turnover justified reassessment. The authorities also found that the assessee did not produce evidence to substantiate the plea that customers had paid those charges on his behalf.
Conclusion: Reassessment under section 19 was validly invoked and sustained; the finding is against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The disputed freight and allied charges were rightly treated as includible in the dealer's turnover, and the reassessment was legally sustainable; the revision was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Charges incurred by a dealer for purchasing and transporting goods to his own premises before resale are part of the purchase turnover and cannot be excluded unless they fall within a permissible statutory deduction linked to the sale transaction and are proved by evidence.
TaxTMI 
