<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 468 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158658</link>
    <description>Freight, loading and unloading charges incurred by a dealer for bringing purchased cement to his own premises were treated as part of purchase turnover and not deductible from taxable turnover. Rule 9(f) allowed deduction only for freight and delivery charges separately specified and charged in the sale transaction, and no proof showed that customers were liable for those expenses. Reassessment under section 19 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 was upheld because the omission of these freight-related amounts amounted to escaped turnover and the statutory conditions for reopening were satisfied. The revision was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2013 15:35:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 468 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158658</link>
      <description>Freight, loading and unloading charges incurred by a dealer for bringing purchased cement to his own premises were treated as part of purchase turnover and not deductible from taxable turnover. Rule 9(f) allowed deduction only for freight and delivery charges separately specified and charged in the sale transaction, and no proof showed that customers were liable for those expenses. Reassessment under section 19 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 was upheld because the omission of these freight-related amounts amounted to escaped turnover and the statutory conditions for reopening were satisfied. The revision was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>