Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether export sales of goods manufactured with concessional inputs fall outside the charging ambit of Section 3(4) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, and whether such transactions are protected by the constitutional prohibition against State taxation on exports.
Analysis: Section 3(4) was held to operate only where, after availing the concessional rate under Section 3(3), the dealer does not sell the manufactured goods but despatches them outside the State by branch transfer, transfer to an agent, or in any other like manner. The Court held that export sales cannot be treated as falling within that residual expression, because Article 286(1)(b) prohibits State taxation on sales in the course of export and Section 5 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 treats such transactions as export sales. The Court also held that, for the purposes of the Act, export transactions satisfy the definition of sale under Section 2(n) and Explanation 3(a), and therefore do not attract the additional levy under Section 3(4). The Court further held that the expression "in any other manner" must be read ejusdem generis with the preceding forms of despatch and cannot be extended to export sales.
Conclusion: Section 3(4) does not apply to export sales, and the levy raised on that basis was unsustainable.