Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondents were entitled to the concessional rate of tax under the notification issued under section 5(1) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 despite despatch of yarn outside the State in violation of the notification conditions.
Analysis: The concessional notification was available only if the statutory conditions were strictly satisfied. Clause (ii) was held to be clear and unambiguous: the mill was not to despatch yarn in the course of inter-State transaction on consignment basis or through ex-State commission agents. The record showed inter-State sales and despatches outside the State, and the respondents themselves had reflected such transactions in their returns. Once despatch outside the State occurred, the benefit of the notification could not be claimed. In view of this clear breach, it was unnecessary to decide whether the mill had been established before 1 December 1979 or whether it qualified as a textile mill.
Conclusion: The respondents were not entitled to the benefit of the notification and the concessional rate of tax.
Ratio Decidendi: A party claiming the benefit of a taxing exemption or concession notification must strictly satisfy every condition in the notification, and where the language is clear, the benefit cannot be extended contrary to its express terms.