Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for assessment year 1982-83, goods sold after filing an application for registration of a trade mark but before grant of registration were liable to be taxed at 10 per cent single point under item 103 of the First Schedule to the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, or at 5 per cent multi-point.
Analysis: The turnover related to pickles sold during assessment year 1982-83. The relevant unamended entry in item 103 applied to goods sold under a brand name registered under the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958. The later amendment with effect from 1 January 1987 expressly enlarged the entry to cover products of manufacturers who had registered their products, whether or not sold under the registered brand name, showing that the earlier entry did not expressly rope in sales made after application for registration but before grant of the certificate. Since the assessment year in question preceded that amendment, the amended entry could not govern the assessment.
Conclusion: The turnover of Rs. 9,11,497 was not liable to be taxed at 10 per cent single point under the unamended entry and had to be taxed at 5 per cent multi-point. The revision was allowed in favour of the assessee.