Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Deputy Commissioner's revisional order withdrawing the exemptions was barred by limitation under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957, and whether the limitation could be saved under the relevant statutory provisions.
Analysis: The revisional order was made nearly seven years after the assessment order. Section 20(3) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 and Rule 14-A(8), Rule 14-A(9) and Rule 14-A(11) of the Central Sales Tax (Andhra Pradesh) Rules, 1957 prescribed a four-year period for exercise of revisional power, and the order was outside that period. Section 24-A of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 was inapplicable because the revisional order was not made to give effect to any finding or direction under the specified provisions. Section 20(6) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 also did not apply because there was no stay of proceedings by the High Court or the Supreme Court, nor any pending proceeding of the kind contemplated by that provision.
Conclusion: The revisional order was barred by limitation and could not be sustained.
Final Conclusion: The revision failed because the Tribunal was correct in holding that the reassessment revision was time-barred and unsaved by the cited provisions.
Ratio Decidendi: A revisional order must be made within the statutory limitation period, and a saving provision can operate only when its specific preconditions are satisfied.