Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether timber purchased and thereafter sliced into splints and sold to match manufacturers could be treated as having been consumed in the manufacture of another commodity so as to attract purchase tax under section 7-A(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959.
Analysis: The decisive test applied was whether the original commodity lost its essential identity in the process. Timber sliced into splints continued to retain its identity as timber, and the process of slicing did not bring into existence a commercially different product. The reasoning was supported by the principle that where there is no essential difference in identity between the original commodity and the processed article, it cannot be said that one has been consumed in the manufacture of the other. The contrary precedent dealing with timber converted into packing cases was distinguished because, in that situation, the end-product was commercially distinct and the original identity of timber was lost.
Conclusion: Purchase tax under section 7-A(1)(a) was not attracted on the purchase of timber used for making splints, and the assessee succeeded.