Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee's tyre retreading unit was entitled to exemption under S.R.O. No. 968/80 on the turnover received as retreading charges, in the light of Article 366(29A)(b) of the Constitution of India and Explanation (3A) to Section 2(xxi) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act.
Analysis: The exemption notification applied only to the turnover from the sale of goods produced and sold by new small-scale industrial units. After the constitutional amendment and the statutory deeming provision, only the transfer of property in goods involved in execution of a works contract was treated as a sale. In retreading activity, even if a manufacturing process was involved and a retreaded tyre emerged as a new article, the taxable element was only the deemed sale of materials used in the work, not a sale of the retreaded tyre as such. Since the notification required a sale of the goods produced, and no such sale of the retreaded tyre existed, the basic condition for exemption was not satisfied.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to exemption under S.R.O. No. 968/80, and denial of the benefit was upheld.