Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether collection of an amount described as sales tax recoupment, without authority under the Act or the Rules, amounted to collection of an amount by way of tax or purporting to be by way of tax so as to attract penalty under section 22; and whether there was any justification for reduction of the penalty.
Analysis: Section 22(1) prohibits collection of any amount by way of tax or purporting to be by way of tax otherwise than in accordance with the Act and the Rules, and section 22(2) authorises imposition of penalty where such collection is made in contravention of that prohibition. The assessee had admittedly collected sales tax recoupment without statutory authority, and the use of that description did not alter the legal character of the collection. The record supported the finding that the collection was a device to recover an amount in substance purporting to be tax. Since the amount so collected was retained, there was no basis for interference with the quantum of penalty.
Conclusion: The collection contravened section 22(1) and attracted penalty under section 22(2) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, and the request for reduction of penalty was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The penalty order was upheld and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: An amount collected without authority under the guise of tax recoupment is a collection purporting to be by way of tax and is liable to penalty under the statutory prohibition.