Bona fide tax collection during a genuine classification dispute does not attract penalty for wrongful tax collection.

Penalty under section 18-A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act was confined to deliberate misuse of the taxing statute for wrongful tax collection. The court's reasoning, as recorded here, turned on the need to establish a guilty mind and a culpable attempt to retain non-refundable tax. Where tax was collected at a higher rate during a genuine dispute over classification and applicable rate, and the Revenue had itself earlier maintained the higher rate, the collection was treated as bona fide and outside the penal provision. The levy of penalty was therefore set aside.

---

---

Issues: Whether penalty under section 18-A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 was attracted where the assessee collected tax at a higher rate pending a genuine dispute as to the applicable entry and rate.

Analysis: Section 18-A is a penal provision intended to prevent misuse of the Act by collecting amounts as tax which are not lawfully leviable. Its application depends on establishment of a guilty mind and a deliberate attempt to enrich oneself by collecting non-refundable tax. Where the assessee collected tax at the higher rate only by way of abundant caution during a continuing dispute on classification and rate, and the Revenue itself had earlier insisted on the higher rate, the collection cannot be treated as a contravention of section 18 merely because the assessee did not agree to refund the excess to customers. The existence of a bona fide dispute and the absence of deliberate misuse of the Act take the case outside the penal provision.

Conclusion: Penalty under section 18-A was not attracted and the revision petitions failed.

Final Conclusion: The levy of penalty was set aside, and the assessee succeeded on the question of penalty liability arising from collection of tax during a disputed classification period.

Ratio Decidendi: A penal provision for wrongful tax collection cannot be invoked unless the Revenue establishes a deliberate and culpable misuse of the taxing statute; bona fide collection at a higher rate during a genuine dispute does not constitute contravention.

---