Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether galvanised iron pipes and tubes were liable to be taxed as an unclassified item under the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948, or were to be treated as a declared commodity attracting tax at the declared rate.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the character of galvanised pipes and tubes in the light of the declared commodity entry under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Relying on the Supreme Court's view that galvanised pipes are steel tubes within the meaning of the relevant declared commodity provision, the Court held that galvanised iron pipes and tubes are not a separate unclassified commodity. Once so classified, the notices issued for reassessment and the assessments made treating them as unclassified item could not stand. The Court also directed that pending proceedings and matters after remand be proceeded with on the footing that galvanised pipes are declared commodity.
Conclusion: Galvanised iron pipes and tubes were held to be declared commodity and not an unclassified item, and the impugned notices, assessment orders and recoveries to that extent were quashed. The petitions succeeded.