Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 10(d) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 was attracted when goods purchased outside Kerala on C form were brought into Kerala and thereafter sent to Bombay for sale instead of being sold within Kerala.
Analysis: The goods were purchased on C form for resale and the dispute turned on whether the statute or rules required the goods to be sold only within Kerala. In the absence of any specific provision imposing such a requirement, the mere fact that the goods were later transported out of Kerala for sale did not amount to a violation bringing the case within the penal provision.
Conclusion: The penalty was not exigible and the assessee succeeded on the penalty issue.
Final Conclusion: The revision was dismissed, and the Revenue's challenge to the penalty failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A penal provision under the Central Sales Tax Act cannot be invoked unless the statute or rules expressly prohibit the conduct relied upon as the basis for penalty.