Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the retrospective amendment to the Himachal Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1968 brought the forest department within the definition of "dealer" so as to render the auction sale of forest trees liable to sales tax.
Analysis: The amended definition of "business" was given retrospective effect by the Legislature by the express language that the amendments "shall always be deemed to have been made". The substituted definition of "dealer" included a person carrying on business whether regularly or otherwise, and specifically covered Government where it buys, sells, supplies or distributes goods for consideration. The amended definition of "goods" also included trees agreed to be severed under a contract of sale, and the definition of "timber" extended to trees when fallen, felled, or agreed to be felled. The court distinguished earlier authorities relied on by the respondent because those cases proceeded on different statutory definitions, particularly where "business" was not defined or the concept of "dealer" was narrower. On the amended language, repeated auctioning of forest produce twice every year amounted to carrying on business, and the forest department was covered by the statutory definition.
Conclusion: The appellants were dealers carrying on business in timber within the amended Act, and the demand for sales tax was valid. The writ petition was liable to be dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a sales tax statute is retrospectively amended to expand the definitions of "business", "dealer" and "goods", repeated auction sales of forest produce by the Government can constitute taxable business even if the transactions are not frequent in the ordinary commercial sense.