<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (4) TMI 278 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155112</link>
    <description>A retrospective amendment to the Himachal Pradesh General Sales Tax Act expanded the definitions of &quot;business&quot;, &quot;dealer&quot; and &quot;goods&quot; by deeming the changes always to have been in force. On that language, Government selling forest produce at repeated auctions could be treated as carrying on business, and the forest department fell within the statutory definition of dealer. Trees agreed to be severed under a contract of sale, and timber when fallen, felled or agreed to be felled, were included within the taxable subject matter. Earlier authorities were distinguished because they turned on narrower definitions. The auction sales of forest trees were therefore liable to sales tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 15:10:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=172143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (4) TMI 278 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155112</link>
      <description>A retrospective amendment to the Himachal Pradesh General Sales Tax Act expanded the definitions of &quot;business&quot;, &quot;dealer&quot; and &quot;goods&quot; by deeming the changes always to have been in force. On that language, Government selling forest produce at repeated auctions could be treated as carrying on business, and the forest department fell within the statutory definition of dealer. Trees agreed to be severed under a contract of sale, and timber when fallen, felled or agreed to be felled, were included within the taxable subject matter. Earlier authorities were distinguished because they turned on narrower definitions. The auction sales of forest trees were therefore liable to sales tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>