Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the expression "his mill" in the exemption and reduction notifications under section 10 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 includes a mill in the exclusive control of the assessee, irrespective of title or ownership.
Analysis: The expression "his mill" was construed in the context of the notifications as referring to a mill solely operated by the assessee. The decisive factor was exclusive control, not title. A person may qualify as a miller if he is in sole control of the mill, whether such control arises from ownership, limited ownership, or other rights. The term "miller" was understood to include not only an owner but also a person who works and operates the mill, provided the miller, whether an individual, partnership, or company, is in exclusive control of the mill.
Conclusion: The expression "his mill" includes a mill under the assessee's exclusive control, and ownership is not essential.
Final Conclusion: The legal meaning of the notifications was declared in favour of a control-based construction, while the actual entitlement to reduced rate was left for determination by the competent appellate authority on the facts.
Ratio Decidendi: In a tax notification, the expression identifying the assessee's mill is to be construed by reference to exclusive control and actual operation, not by reference to title or ownership alone.