Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the husk of soyabean was covered by the exemption notification dated 7th April, 1967, and therefore not liable to turnover tax under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958.
Analysis: The notification issued under section 12 of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 exempted husk of all grains, cereals, pulses and rice. The term "cereal" was not defined in the Act and was taken in its ordinary sense as a grain used for food. Soyabean was held to be capable of use as food, and its character as an oil-seed did not exclude it from the category of grain for the purpose of the notification. Reference to section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act was held to be unjustified for construing the exemption notification issued under the State Act.
Conclusion: Husk of soyabean was covered by the notification and was exempt from tax. The question was answered in the negative and in favour of the assessee.