<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (1) TMI 461 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154828</link>
    <description>Husk of soyabean was treated as covered by the exemption notification issued under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958, which exempted husk of all grains, cereals, pulses and rice. The court read &quot;cereal&quot; in its ordinary sense as a grain used for food, and held that soyabean&#039;s use as food brought it within that description despite its character as an oil-seed. It also held that reference to section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act was not justified for construing the State exemption notification. The husk was therefore exempt from turnover tax, and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 16:13:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (1) TMI 461 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154828</link>
      <description>Husk of soyabean was treated as covered by the exemption notification issued under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958, which exempted husk of all grains, cereals, pulses and rice. The court read &quot;cereal&quot; in its ordinary sense as a grain used for food, and held that soyabean&#039;s use as food brought it within that description despite its character as an oil-seed. It also held that reference to section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act was not justified for construing the State exemption notification. The husk was therefore exempt from turnover tax, and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>