Sale price includes pre-delivery carrying and incidental charges when not shown to be separate from the sale consideration.

Amounts recovered from the purchaser before delivery were treated as part of the sale consideration where there was no material to show that carrying charges and incidental expenses were independent of the sale transaction. The Court held that carrying charges, postage, telephone and telegram expenses formed part of the sale price for sales tax purposes because they were recovered in connection with the sale of cotton and cotton seed and were not shown to be excluded from the contractual consideration. As a result, those amounts were includible in the taxable turnover.

---

---

Issues: Whether carrying charges and allied expenses such as postage, telephone and telegram charges formed part of the sale price for sales tax purposes.

Analysis: The references arose under section 44 of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958 read with section 9 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The decisive question was whether the amounts recovered under the heads of carrying charges and other incidental expenses were part of the consideration for the sale of cotton and cotton seed. The Court noted that the taxing authorities had found that the charges were recovered before delivery and that there was no material to show that they were excluded from the contractual consideration. In the absence of proof that the amounts were independent of the sale transaction, and in light of the view already taken in similar sales tax decisions, the contention that they lay outside the sale price was rejected.

Conclusion: Carrying charges and the other disputed expenses formed part of the sale price and were liable to sales tax.

Ratio Decidendi: Amounts recovered from the purchaser before delivery, unless shown to be independent of the sale consideration, are includible in sale price for sales tax purposes.

---