Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment under section 19(1) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958 was barred because the original assessment had attained finality after the first or second appeal, even though the point on which reassessment was made had not been raised or decided in the appeal proceedings.
Analysis: The reference turned on the interaction between the finality attached to appellate orders under section 38(6) of the State Act and the separate reassessment power under section 19(1). The Court held that the mere fact that an assessment order had become final in appeal did not, by itself, exclude the assessing authority's jurisdiction to reopen the matter if the statutory conditions for reassessment were satisfied. Since the issue on which reassessment was made had not been agitated or decided in the earlier appeal, there was no bar in principle to action under section 19(1).
Conclusion: Reassessment was not barred on the ground of prior appellate finality, and the question was answered in favour of the department and against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The statutory power of reassessment remained available despite the earlier appeal, provided the conditions for reopening existed and the particular issue had not already been adjudicated.
Ratio Decidendi: Finality of an appellate assessment does not preclude reassessment under the statute where the issue proposed for reassessment was not decided in appeal and the reassessment conditions are otherwise satisfied.