1971 (11) TMI 148 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

Court rules iron baling hoops not 'iron and steel' under tax law

Commissioner of Sales Tax, Madhya Pradesh Versus Hirji Nainsee & Co, Ujjain

Commissioner of Sales Tax, Madhya Pradesh Versus Hirji Nainsee & Co, Ujjain - [1972] 29 STC 365 (MP) Issues:Interpretation of whether iron baling hoops fall within the definition of 'iron and steel' under section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act.Analysis:1. Interpretation of Relevant Provisions:The case involved determining whether iron baling hoops could be classified as 'iron and steel' under section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act. The Act defines certain goods as of special importance in inter-State trade or commerce, including iron and steel. The relevant section, 14(iv), lists specific items falling under this category, such as pig iron, steel scrap, and rolled steel sections. The tax rate applicable to these declared goods is limited to 2% or 3% under section 15 of the Act.2. Examination of Clause (iv) of Section 14:The court analyzed the provisions of clause (iv) of section 14 in detail. It was observed that iron baling hoops could potentially be considered under the category of 'rolled steel sections,' the only subclause that might apply to these items. However, the court concluded that iron hoops did not fit the description of 'rolled steel sections' as they are thin straps used for bundling materials, not structural construction.3. Misinterpretation of Concession:The court noted that a concession made by the department's counsel was misinterpreted. The concession only pertained to the tax rate applicable if the iron hoops were treated as declared goods, not to their classification under 'iron and steel.' Circular letters from the Government of India were deemed non-binding for interpreting the Act.4. Judgment and Conclusion:Based on the interpretation of the relevant provisions and the nature of iron baling hoops, the court held that these items did not fall within the definition of 'iron and steel' under section 14 of the Act. Consequently, the assessee was not liable to be taxed at the lower rate applicable to declared goods. The court upheld the tax assessment at 10% by the sales tax authorities, ruling in favor of the Commissioner of Sales Tax, M.P.In conclusion, the court answered the reference by stating that the Tribunal was not justified in treating iron baling hoops as falling within the definition of 'iron and steel' under the Central Sales Tax Act. The assessee was properly taxed at 10%, and costs were awarded to the Commissioner of Sales Tax, M.P.