Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, under section 10(6) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, the Tribunal was bound to stay recovery of the entire disputed tax once it waived the requirement of deposit of one-third of the disputed amount, or whether it retained discretion to grant stay only to a part of the disputed tax.
Analysis: The provision empowered the Tribunal to stay recovery of the disputed amount pending appeal, but the proviso made entertainment of a stay application contingent upon satisfactory proof of deposit of at least one-third of the disputed amount, subject to waiver or relaxation for special reasons. The word "entertain" was construed in the sense of admitting the matter to consideration on merits, showing that stay was not automatic and that the statutory condition operated as a threshold requirement. Reading the provision as a whole, the Tribunal was held to have discretion not only on whether to grant stay, but also on the extent of the disputed tax to be stayed.
Conclusion: The Tribunal had full discretion under section 10(6) to stay only part of the disputed tax. The revision was dismissed.