Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cotton-coated fabric fell within the expression "cotton fabrics of all varieties" in the exemption notification issued under the U.P. Sales Tax Act and was therefore exempt from sales tax.
Analysis: The expression "cotton fabrics of all varieties" was not defined in the notification, so its scope had to be determined in the sense in which ordinary traders and merchants understand the commodity. The reasoning drew support from the statutory treatment of cotton fabrics in section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act and item 19 of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, where fabrics impregnated, coated or laminated with artificial materials are included within cotton fabrics. The Court also relied on the common parlance approach accepted in decisions concerning textile goods and on the department's own circular indicating that cotton-coated fabrics were covered by the notification.
Conclusion: Cotton-coated fabric was held to be covered by the exemption entry and exempt from levy of sales tax.
Final Conclusion: The revision failed because the Tribunal's view that cotton-coated fabric was exempt under the notification was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption entry uses an expression of commercial description, its scope is to be determined in common parlance, and aid may be taken from cognate statutes that expressly define the commodity.