Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether H.D.P.E. fabrics were "declared goods" under Section 14(vii) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 so as to be taxable under clause (a) of Section 3-A(1) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, and not as unclassified goods under clause (e) thereof.
Analysis: H.D.P.E. woven fabrics were held to answer the description of rayon or artificial silk fabrics falling under Item 22 of the Central Excise Tariff, which is the statutory reference point for Section 14(vii) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The Court also relied on departmental tariff advice and prior judicial treatment to hold that such fabrics fall within the declared goods category. Once the goods are declared goods, the State taxing provision is controlled by Section 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, and the turnover cannot be subjected to the higher rate applicable to unclassified goods under clause (e) of Section 3-A(1).
Conclusion: H.D.P.E. fabrics were liable to be assessed under clause (a) of Section 3-A(1) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act and not under clause (e) thereof.