Composite works contract and dissolved firm assessment: labour-material framing was not a sale, and post-dissolution tax assessment was barred.

A composite transaction for framing pictures, involving both labour and material for a consolidated charge, was treated as execution of work rather than a sale of goods, so it was not liable to sales tax on the facts stated. The ruling also states that, under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1939, a dissolved partnership firm could not be assessed after dissolution unless the statute expressly authorised such post-dissolution assessment. The saving provision preserved pending or enforceable proceedings, but it did not create a power to assess a dissolved firm where no equivalent provision existed in the 1939 Act.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the activity of framing pictures for customers for a consolidated charge for labour and material constituted a sale liable to sales tax, or a works contract. (ii) Whether, under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1939, the tax authorities could assess the turnover of a partnership firm after its dissolution.

Issue (i): Whether the activity of framing pictures for customers for a consolidated charge for labour and material constituted a sale liable to sales tax, or a works contract.

Analysis: The transaction was found to be composite, involving both supply of material and labour. On those facts, the substance of the arrangement was not a sale of picture-frames as goods, but execution of work for the customer. The factual finding of the revising authority was held to be justified.

Conclusion: The activity amounted to a works contract and not a taxable sale.

Issue (ii): Whether, under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1939, the tax authorities could assess the turnover of a partnership firm after its dissolution.

Analysis: The saving provision in section 61(1)(ii)(e) preserved pending and enforceable proceedings despite repeal. The Court also applied the principle that, absent a statutory provision authorising assessment of a dissolved firm, no assessment could be made after dissolution. Since the 1939 Act did not contain a provision equivalent to section 19-A of the 1959 Act, the assessment of the dissolved firm could not be sustained.

Conclusion: The assessment of the dissolved firm was not permissible under the 1939 Act.

Final Conclusion: The challenges to taxability in both matters failed, and the tax authorities could not sustain the impugned assessments or levy on the stated facts.

Ratio Decidendi: A composite transaction of labour and material is not a sale where the substance of the arrangement is execution of work, and a dissolved firm cannot be assessed after dissolution unless the governing statute expressly authorises such assessment.

---