Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in reassessment proceedings under section 19(1) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958, a separate penalty under section 43(1) can also be imposed where the turnover was deliberately concealed or a false return was filed.
Analysis: Section 19(1) empowers reassessment and authorises a penalty at the time of reassessment, but it does not itself create the acts or omissions that attract penalty. Those grounds are supplied by other provisions, including section 43(1), which specifically deals with deliberate concealment of turnover and false returns. The Court held that when reassessment is made on such facts, the penalty imposed under section 19(1) is referable to the liability arising under section 43(1), subject to the maximum limit fixed by section 19(1). The statutory scheme does not permit the Commissioner to impose two distinct penalties for the same concealment merely because reassessment proceedings are also pending.
Conclusion: No separate penalty under section 43(1) can be imposed in reassessment proceedings if penalty has already been imposed under section 19(1) for the same concealment or false return.
Ratio Decidendi: Where reassessment penalty is imposed under section 19(1) on facts constituting concealment or false return, the statute permits only one penalty for that default, and section 19(1) cannot be used to impose an additional separate penalty under section 43(1).