Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the object of the assessee-trust was an object of general public utility under section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. (ii) Whether the earning of substantial profit affected the assessee-trust's status as a trust existing for an object of general public utility and its entitlement to exemption under section 11, and to what extent section 11(4A) applied.
Issue (i): Whether the object of the assessee-trust was an object of general public utility under section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The deletion, by the 1984 amendment, of the words restricting charitable purpose to objects not involving activity for profit restored the position substantially to that obtaining under section 4(3)(i) of the 1922 Act. On the facts, the trust's activity continued to be treated as one of general public utility, and the earlier denial of exemption had rested on the former profit restriction in section 2(15).
Conclusion: Yes. The assessee-trust was held to be pursuing an object of general public utility under section 2(15).
Issue (ii): Whether the earning of substantial profit affected the assessee-trust's status as a trust existing for an object of general public utility and its entitlement to exemption under section 11, and to what extent section 11(4A) applied.
Analysis: Section 11(4A) was held to operate only in relation to income consisting of profits and gains of business. The condition of incidental business and maintenance of separate books limited denial of exemption to business income alone. The amendment to section 2(15) did not displace exemption for incomes assessable under other heads, such as house property, capital gains, or income from other sources.
Conclusion: Earning substantial profit did not alter the trust's character as one existing for general public utility, but exemption under section 11 was denied for business income unless the statutory conditions were satisfied; exemption for other heads of income remained available.
Final Conclusion: The questions referred were answered substantially in the assessee's favour on charitable character and the limited operation of the business-income disqualification, and the appeals were sent back for decision in accordance with those answers.
Ratio Decidendi: After the 1984 amendment, the general public utility limb of charitable purpose under section 2(15) was restored to the pre-1961 position, while section 11(4A) confined denial of exemption to business profits and did not affect exemption for income under other heads.