Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Board of Revenue was justified in refusing to state a case on the ground that no question of law arose, and whether the construction of clause (b) of item 8 of the Schedule to the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act gave rise to a referable question of law.
Analysis: The right to seek a reference under section 15(1) turned on whether the Board's order raised a question of law, not on the correctness of the Board's merits decision. The fact that the Board had taken a view on the taxability of disc-harrows and cultivators did not eliminate the legal issue whether the relevant schedule entry was exhaustive or illustrative, how the deeming language in column 3 operated, and what effect the exemption notification under section 4(2) had. The construction of the statutory entry itself was not free from doubt or difficulty, and therefore the matter disclosed a question of law warranting reference.
Conclusion: The refusal to state a case was unjustified, and the Board was required to refer the question to the High Court.
Ratio Decidendi: For the purpose of a statutory reference, the existence of a question of law depends on the nature of the issue arising from the order, not on the correctness of the authority's conclusion on merits; if the construction of the statutory entry is debatable, a reference must be made.