<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (10) TMI 133 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151266</link>
    <description>A statutory reference under section 15(1) depends on whether the Board&#039;s order discloses a question of law, not on whether its merits conclusion is correct. The Rajasthan High Court noted that the construction of clause (b) of item 8 of the Schedule to the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, including whether the entry was exhaustive or illustrative, the effect of the deeming language in column 3, and the relevance of the exemption notification under section 4(2), was debatable and not free from difficulty. The Board&#039;s refusal to state a case was therefore unjustified, and the matter had to be referred to the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 14:23:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (10) TMI 133 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151266</link>
      <description>A statutory reference under section 15(1) depends on whether the Board&#039;s order discloses a question of law, not on whether its merits conclusion is correct. The Rajasthan High Court noted that the construction of clause (b) of item 8 of the Schedule to the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, including whether the entry was exhaustive or illustrative, the effect of the deeming language in column 3, and the relevance of the exemption notification under section 4(2), was debatable and not free from difficulty. The Board&#039;s refusal to state a case was therefore unjustified, and the matter had to be referred to the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>