Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a dealer, after filing an application under section 30 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, could have the figure of admitted turnover in that application rectified on the ground of a clerical or bona fide mistake.
Analysis: The proviso to section 30 requires the application to be accompanied by proof of payment of the admitted tax, but it does not forbid correction of an entry in the contents of an application already filed within time. The admitted turnover shown in the return does not bind the assessee if it was entered under mistake, and the same principle applies to an application under section 30. The court also noted that section 22 permits rectification of mistakes in orders of sales tax authorities, and that no limitation barred an amendment sought before the application was disposed of, especially where no additional tax payment was required.
Conclusion: The rectification was permissible, and the question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to correction of the mistaken turnover figure in the section 30 application, and the reference was answered in his favour.
Ratio Decidendi: A mistake in the contents of a timely filed application under section 30 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act may be rectified before disposal, and the proviso requiring proof of payment of admitted tax does not bar such correction where no additional tax liability arises.