Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat/Cenvat credit could be denied on inputs written off in the balance sheet as shortage, where the quantity involved was negligible in relation to total inputs received and the inputs were found to be incapable of separate use in manufacture.
Analysis: The disputed inputs represented less than 0.7% of the total quantity procured in the relevant financial years. The finding of shortage was based on write-off entries in the balance sheet, and the explanation accepted was that the inputs were not truly missing but were present in an inseparably mixed condition and therefore could not be segregated for use. The Tribunal followed its earlier decisions and the cited precedent to hold that when the quantity written off is negligible and the inputs are effectively unavailable for separate use in the manufacturing process, credit cannot be denied merely because the balance sheet reflects a write-off.
Conclusion: Denial of Modvat/Cenvat credit was not justified, and the assessees were entitled to the credit.
Final Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside and the appeals were allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: Credit on inputs cannot be denied merely because a negligible quantity is written off in the balance sheet, if the materials were received in the factory and were not separately usable in manufacture.