<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 51 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1492</link>
    <description>Modvat/Cenvat credit should not be denied merely because a negligible quantity of inputs is written off in the balance sheet as shortage, where the goods were received in the factory and were not separately usable in manufacture. The Tribunal noted that the disputed inputs were less than 0.7% of total procurement and accepted the explanation that they remained in an inseparably mixed condition rather than being truly missing. On that basis, and following prior precedent, the write-off entry alone was insufficient to justify credit denial, so the credit was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 51 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1492</link>
      <description>Modvat/Cenvat credit should not be denied merely because a negligible quantity of inputs is written off in the balance sheet as shortage, where the goods were received in the factory and were not separately usable in manufacture. The Tribunal noted that the disputed inputs were less than 0.7% of total procurement and accepted the explanation that they remained in an inseparably mixed condition rather than being truly missing. On that basis, and following prior precedent, the write-off entry alone was insufficient to justify credit denial, so the credit was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>