Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee could be denied the concessional rate under section 3(3) of the Madras General Sales Tax Act merely because the prescribed declarations in Form XVII were not attached to the monthly returns, when they were produced before final assessment.
Analysis: Section 3(3) granted the concessional rate subject to furnishing a declaration in the prescribed manner, and rule 22 of the Madras General Sales Tax Rules, 1959 prescribed Form XVII and required attachment of the original declaration to the return. The proviso did not expressly impose a time-limit requiring the declaration to accompany the return itself. Section 53 conferred rule-making power, but that power could not be used to read into the proviso a time-limit not supported by its language. The declarations having been furnished before the assessment order, the requirement of the provision was treated as satisfied.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the concessional rate and could not be denied relief solely because the declarations were not filed along with the monthly returns.