Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee could be denied the concessional rate of tax under section 3(3) of the Madras General Sales Tax Act on the ground that the declarations in form XVII were not filed along with the monthly returns as contemplated by rule 22(5) of the Madras General Sales Tax Rules, although they were filed before the assessment order was made.
Analysis: The filing of declarations in the prescribed manner under section 3(3) did not, on the language of the proviso, authorise the rule-making authority to prescribe a time-limit for filing them. Since the statute did not require the declarations to be filed within a particular period, the benefit of concessional tax could not be denied merely because the correct declarations were filed after the monthly returns but before assessment. The assessee's case fell within the earlier binding principle applying the same statutory scheme.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the concessional rate of tax under section 3(3) on the basis of the declarations filed before the assessing authority.
Final Conclusion: The entitlement to concessional tax was affirmed, but the matter required fresh verification by the Tribunal as to the extent of relief admissible.
Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of an express statutory time-limit, the words "in the prescribed manner" do not permit denial of a tax concession merely because the declaration was filed after the return but before assessment.