Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sales tax penalty liability of the company had to be taken into account while valuing the unquoted equity shares under rule 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957.
Analysis: The liability claimed by the assessee was rejected by the Wealth-tax Officer, but the appellate authorities accepted it. The Court followed the earlier view that the Tribunal's order relating to the company's liability could not be ignored and that the exact quantum of sales tax penalty liability on the valuation date had to be determined before valuing the shares under rule 1D.
Conclusion: The matter was remitted to the Appellate Tribunal to determine the exact quantum of sales tax liability towards penalty on the valuation date and to direct valuation of the shares accordingly.