Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2000 (11) TMI 115 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        High Court rules on salary disallowance under Income-tax Act but denies weighted deduction on brokerage and commission. The High Court held that the salary payable to the floating staff for employment outside India should not be disallowed under section 40A(5)(a) of the ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          High Court rules on salary disallowance under Income-tax Act but denies weighted deduction on brokerage and commission.

                          The High Court held that the salary payable to the floating staff for employment outside India should not be disallowed under section 40A(5)(a) of the Income-tax Act, ruling in favor of the assessee. However, the court denied the assessee's claim for a weighted deduction under section 35B on brokerage and commission on freight paid in foreign countries, ruling in favor of the Department.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Whether the salary payable to the floating staff for the period of employment outside India should not be considered for disallowance under section 40A(5)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                          2. Whether the assessee was entitled to weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on brokerage and commission on freight paid in foreign countries for the assessment year 1977-78.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Disallowance of Salary Payable to Floating Staff under Section 40A(5)(a):

                          The primary issue was whether the salary payable to the floating staff for the period of employment outside India should be considered for disallowance under section 40A(5)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer included the salary payable to the floating staff of an Indian vessel for a period of employment outside India, reasoning that as long as the Indian flag was flying on the ship, it was considered Indian territory. Consequently, the place of employment of the floating staff was deemed to be in India, making section 40A(5) applicable.

                          The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) disagreed, interpreting section 40A(5)(b)(i) to exclude the salary paid for employment outside the territorial boundaries of India from disallowance. This decision was upheld by the Tribunal, leading the Department to refer the matter to the High Court.

                          The High Court analyzed section 40A(5) and emphasized the distinction between "employment in India" and "employment outside India." It was noted that section 40A(5)(a) imposes a ceiling on salary expenditure for employment in India, while section 40A(5)(b)(i) excludes salary expenditure for employment outside India from this ceiling. The court rejected the Department's argument that the terms "working outside India" and "employment outside India" were synonymous, clarifying that the terms of the contract, nature of work, and place of performance were crucial in determining the location of employment.

                          The court also considered the definition of "India" under section 2(25A), which does not extend to Indian ships operating beyond territorial waters. The circular issued by the Board (No. 586, dated November 28, 1990) supported this interpretation, indicating that Indian ships outside territorial waters do not form part of "India" for tax purposes.

                          The High Court concluded that the salary paid to the floating staff for employment outside India should not be disallowed under section 40A(5)(a), answering the question in the affirmative, i.e., against the Department and in favor of the assessee.

                          2. Weighted Deduction under Section 35B on Brokerage and Commission:

                          An additional question in I.T.R. No. 342 of 1988 concerned whether the assessee was entitled to weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on brokerage and commission on freight paid in foreign countries for the assessment year 1977-78.

                          The High Court referred to the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Aravinda Paramila Works v. CIT [1999] 237 ITR 284, which guided the decision. Consequently, the question was answered in the negative, i.e., in favor of the Department and against the assessee.

                          Conclusion:

                          The High Court ruled that the salary payable to the floating staff for the period of employment outside India should not be considered for disallowance under section 40A(5)(a), siding with the assessee. However, the court denied the assessee's claim for a weighted deduction under section 35B on brokerage and commission on freight paid in foreign countries, siding with the Department.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found