Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the compensation received for requisitioned property accrued as income in the assessment year 1967-68 and whether the matter should be remitted for fresh consideration in the light of the nature of the State's appeal.
Analysis: The controlling question was whether the State Government's challenge went only to the quantification of compensation or extended to the very liability to pay compensation. Under the charging scheme of section 5 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, income is taxable on receipt or accrual, and accrual arises only when the assessee acquires an enforceable right to receive the amount, creating a debt due in its favour. Section 8(2) of the PEPSU Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1954 contemplated recurring compensation for requisitioned property, but the court distinguished between a case where only the amount is disputed and a case where the right to compensation itself is in controversy. As the appeal memo was not before the court and the record did not clearly establish the scope of the State's challenge, the issue could not be finally resolved on the existing material.
Conclusion: The matter was remitted to the Tribunal to determine afresh whether the State's appeal disputed the right to compensation itself or only its quantification. The other referred questions were not answered.
Ratio Decidendi: Compensation for requisitioned property accrues as income only when the assessee's right to receive it is admitted and not in real dispute; if the right itself is contested in appeal, no accrual occurs until that dispute is resolved.