<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 57 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14302</link>
    <description>Compensation for requisitioned property accrues as income only when the assessee has an enforceable and admitted right to receive it; where the right itself remains in genuine dispute, no accrual arises until that dispute is resolved. The court distinguished a challenge limited to the quantum of compensation from one attacking liability to pay compensation at all, because accrual under the Income-tax Act depends on the existence of a debt due in favour of the assessee. As the record did not clearly show the scope of the State&#039;s appeal, the matter was remitted for fresh determination on whether the appeal concerned only quantification or the underlying right to compensation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:20:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 57 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14302</link>
      <description>Compensation for requisitioned property accrues as income only when the assessee has an enforceable and admitted right to receive it; where the right itself remains in genuine dispute, no accrual arises until that dispute is resolved. The court distinguished a challenge limited to the quantum of compensation from one attacking liability to pay compensation at all, because accrual under the Income-tax Act depends on the existence of a debt due in favour of the assessee. As the record did not clearly show the scope of the State&#039;s appeal, the matter was remitted for fresh determination on whether the appeal concerned only quantification or the underlying right to compensation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>