Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether waiver of pre-deposit of service tax, interest and penalties was warranted and recovery should be stayed during the pendency of the appeals.
Analysis: The demand arose from denial of abatement under Notification No. 32/04-S.T. on the ground that declarations regarding non-availment of CENVAT credit and non-availment of the benefit of Notification No. 12/03-S.T. had not been produced in respect of certain transporters. The applicants contended that the service providers were only truck owners and not goods transport agencies, and therefore were not liable to service tax or registration. The Tribunal found prima facie force in this submission, noting the absence of any finding that the transport providers were registered or that proceedings had been taken against them for non-registration or non-payment of service tax.
Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of the tax, interest and penalties was stayed pending disposal of the appeals.